Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 07:21

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
The World Ends with You Director Tatsuya Kando Leaves Square Enix - Anime News Network
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump travel ban rattles immigrant communities across U.S. - The Washington Post
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
The Sun Is Causing Starlink Satellites To Drop From Space - Daily Kos
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
10 Habits that are Aging Your Gut, According to Experts - EatingWell
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Save up to $357 off Apple’s most affordable 13-inch Space Black M4 iPad Pro today - 9to5Toys
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Knight, Nurse among unprotected in PWHL expansion - theScore.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.